The New Khmer Architecture movement occurred in Cambodia in the 50s and 60s, blending modern styles with traditional, Cambodian cultural elements. The style became synonymous with the politically driven experiment in economic development envisaged by Norodom Sihanouk, the former King, Prime Minister, and Head of State of the country.
The movement and period led to the creation of a number of fantastic pieces of residential, public, and commercial architecture. Sadly instability in the country and wars resulted in the destruction of many of them, including numerous churches in Phnom Penh, the capital city. Others were left to neglect and decay. Some ultimately have become the focus of ruthless redevelopment.
The White Building, formerly known as the Municipal Apartments, is the latest iconic New Khmer landmark to be lost. It was built in 1963 and was a fantastic example of the modern vision for Cambodia. The 468 apartments were aimed at tenants with moderate incomes, particularly those working in the arts. The design with its six three or four storey blocks and open bridges was very attractive at the time.
Sadly the years have not been kind to the building. It has gradually deteriorated since the 1970s and municipal authorities ultimately claimed that the structure was deteriorating. This may have been caused by the countless additions made by tenants, including enclosing the balconies and fitting lofts into the high ceilinged apartments.
The initial decision to evict tenants came in 2015 after cracks began appearing in the concrete. Efforts for preservation persisted though, hoping the property could be saved. Sadly earlier in 2017 it was decided that demolition was the only option. A new 21 storey mixed-use development will be built on the site once the current building is demolished.
In the final days of the White Building it is definitely worth remembering the residential, public and commercial architecture created during the New Khmer movement. The idea to support arts and architects in pursuit of modernisation and economic development was a good one; it is sad that conditions were not right to see how successful it could have been.